Hope this hasn't been posted yet...

[ladyshrew.livejournal.com]

But sometimes being a classicist has its advantages--an article on the "historical" King Arthur and the movie.

Thoughts?

I'm still annoyed at their legendary names (in a supposedly historical film) and the consequential butchery of individual characters (mostly because now everyone will think there was a real Lancelot and a real Bors-with-eleven-children, etc). ;-)

[Crossposted to my own LJ because I'm a stupid git who posted it to the wrong LJ this morning. :-P]

Shrew